Even though IMR 4831 and H4831SC are distinctive powders, you can find that in many scenarios, wherever one of these is detailed the other will be likewise. Also, you'll find there is a fairly constant marriage amongst them with regard to mentioned loads.
H4831SC Powder accessible in stock now. Ballistically, this Severe Extruded powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Physically, it has a shorter grain measurement, thus, the designation SC or small Lower. The shorter, a lot more compact kernels enable the powder to circulation throughout the powder actions extra easily, assisting to reduce the frequent reducing of granules.
4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I found this combo produces .5MOA groups with velocity about 3020fps from a 26" barrel. I take advantage of this same powder in my 300wm shooting 180gr products, so It is pleasant to acquire one powder for the two.
Warning applying SC or SSC made loads with lengthy Minimize, again off and perform up. Use Protected loading approaches.
Alaska The sc loads up a tiny bit far better but They are really the very same detail, one is simply brief Lower. I’ve even blended the conventional 1 Along with the SC and gotten the same outcomes as applying one or one other.
I've made use of H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem without difference. The only thing would be the limited Minimize offers you a bit more House. Great luck!gun)
Nampa, Idaho In my knowledge the one actual distinction would be that the shortcut meters greater as a result of reloading equipment. At the time It really is loaded theres no purposeful distinction. h4831 vs h4831sc I've listened to which the shortcut can have a very small little bit speedier burn off price but It appears insignificant.
Im underneath the knowledge I desire to use h4831sc. I have study that these powders are equivalent besides the shorter grain dimensions of your sc. Should I however be on the lookout for h4381sc?
I have located the precise opposite to get accurate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and Similarly accurate powder in my three hundred Earn Mag.
Liberalism; The not possible but acknowledged Idea that it's solely probable to pick up a turd from the clean h4831 vs h4831sc up conclusion.
Run your load up with the precise powder (sc or regular) and whole lot you're making use of nevertheless. Identical burn up charge doesn't suggest it is going to behave "just" precisely the same. I've observed about 100 fps distinction between sc and mil-surp numerous H4831.
It is really very likely that no even more discussion is required, through which scenario we advocate starting a different thread. If on the other hand you really feel your response is required you are able to nevertheless do so.
Many of the aged Lyman data just outlined IMR 4831, which was surplus armed service powder and now newer mfg as H4831.
I sawed one in 50 percent to find out how thick the jackets were being, plus they have been easily twice as thick as being a fifty-grain hollow level was. Ditto for your sixty four-grain Energy Stage, as these bullets are crafted for deer, not prairie canine or woodchucks. You now know all the things I find out about the 22-250 and gradual-burning powders, and I don't know something in the least with regards to the 223. I question h4831 vs h4831sc that you are going to get anyplace with that cartridge and 4831, but let us understand how it goes.